Showing posts with label website. Show all posts
Showing posts with label website. Show all posts
Sunday, April 26, 2009
Free Law Advice?
Well holy holy, i just stumbled upon the following site meant for free advice on various topics of interest (law advice). I thought this was very cool because other then this and web MD, there are not many sites giving away information related to high priced careers. anywho the site is http://family-law.freeadvice.com/
Monday, April 13, 2009
Static Chaos Incorporated
I was considering making a web marketing buisness. I'm very well versed in the many forms of marketing to use on the web for either personal as well as corporate. Honestly i've spent some time figuring out what exactly it was i wanted to do. I've known for some time that i wanted a couple internet buisnesses at the least. I have and do still have an exceptional tallent at marketing others through the web, and have a very good track record with their growth. The first thing on a series of different campaigns i'm considering launching regarding a corporate internet..
Sunday, April 12, 2009
Affluence the social nightmare or elitist tool of marketing
Affluence is a social network that demands it's members have a min of 300 thousand dollars income in order to be able to join. it's interesting to see a site jump on the bandwaggon of elitist thoughts and make it easier for those of considerable income to network with others of the same social standing. my thoughts are fairly mixed, i know i know you may be thinking unfair i can't join because i'm poor in comparison to that? well that may be true but each website is considered private property although publicly accessable and thus i understand while there may be sentiments, over all the idea seems to be fairly interesting at least
Vampires... Crazed or Fact? you pick the insantiy
vampires, are they real or are they simply just a figment of some crazed individuals mind.
there are many sites claiming the powers of vampirism including temple of the vampire, www.vampirewebsite.net, sanguinarius, and even in the local school communities. however according to this video, this fad that has hit modern society has it's bad points in addition to the good ones. watch and find out just what i mean. i remind you just in the last year we have had a number of films including but not limited to twilight and books written by anne rice produced and published effecting not only the youth but society as a whole.
there are many sites claiming the powers of vampirism including temple of the vampire, www.vampirewebsite.net, sanguinarius, and even in the local school communities. however according to this video, this fad that has hit modern society has it's bad points in addition to the good ones. watch and find out just what i mean. i remind you just in the last year we have had a number of films including but not limited to twilight and books written by anne rice produced and published effecting not only the youth but society as a whole.
Friday, April 3, 2009
Website taken down for releasal of siezed government document some issues enclosed...
I found it interesting how the website wikileaks was ripped from the web after releasing several confidential government documents. Wikileaks was at one point in time developing an uncensored version of wikepdia. however after exposing gov. Palin's private email address. Not only was Gov Palin's email addressed exposed but they took control of the account and exposed a number of emails exchanged between Palin and Alaska Lieutenant Governor Sean Parnell about his campaign for Congress.A draft letter to California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, mentioning nominations for the state court of appeals, many emails about the Alaska Department of Public Safety were siezed. It's fairly interesting that implications have been made that these emails concerning DPS who's main job is to supervise the Alaska state troopers were relevant regarding Gov Palin's former brother-in-law and her push for removing him from the force. I am happy to see that he is still a part of the force, I would hate to see someone lose their job simply over bad blood between two families and one person's governmental influence. Inside her contact listing
Australian Government was also exposed for unI found it interesting how the website wikileaks.org was ripped from the web after releasing several confidential government documents. Wikileaks was at one point in time developing an uncensored version of wikepdia. however after exposing gov. Palin's private email address. Not only was Gov Palin's email addressed exposed but they took control of the account and exposed a number of emails exchanged between Palin and Alaskan Lieutenant Governor Sean Parnell about his campaign for Congress.A draft letter to California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, mentioning nominations for the state court of appeals, many emails about the Alaska Department of Public Safety were seized. It's fairly interesting that implications have been made that these emails concerning DPS who's main job is to supervise the Alaska state troopers were relevant regarding Gov Palin's former brother-in-law and her push for removing him from the force. I am happy to see that he is still a part of the force, I would hate to see someone lose their job simply over bad blood between two families and one person's governmental influence. Inside her contact listing
Australian Government was also exposed for un-ethical behavior of their dental program *they denied such allegations* ...
Wiki leaks believed that if what the government did was transparent there would be less corruption as they would be subject to the public eye. They had supported the idea that a democracy should have an educated mass that had the ability to see everything they had an interest in. They had believed that because the mass population are uneducated in world and current local affairs it is why they are preyed upon as they are ignorant to what goes behind them.
I remember once stumbling on an ex CIA opperation called project butterfly exposing the CIA's attempt to recreate Nazi brain control done during WW1, recently i found that the article was removed and is no longer accessable. The question is should practices like this be exposed, when they most certainly do exist. Or should the public remain intoxicated on whatever fumes the government spits at them?
Wiki leaks believed that if what the government did was transparent there would be less corruption as they would be subject to the public eye. They had supported the idea that a democracy should have an educated mass that had the ability to see everything they had an interest in. They had believed that because the mass population are uneducated in world and current local affairs it is why they are preyed upon as they are ignorant to what goes behind them.
I remember once stumbling on an ex CIA operation called project butterfly exposing the CIA's attempt to recreate Nazi brain control done during WW1, recently i found that the article was removed and is no longer accessible. The question is should practices like this be exposed, when they most certainly do exist. Or should the public remain intoxicated on whatever fumes the government spits at them? This woman in question was perm scarred from the damage done to her mind. She will never be the same as she was before.
Before talking about this farther i want to share with you a few quotes.
“We were young, we were foolish, we were arrogant, but we were right.” -- Daniel Ellsberg (Pentagon Papers)
“Three things can not hide for long: the Moon, the Sun and the Truth” -- Siddhartha
It was once said by the United States Supreme Court that "only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government." This statement created by them is undeniably true. If the press is enforced to only report on what the government believes is acceptable then they are not reporting the whole truth, they are just reporting the bits and pieces of it that is ready to become public. We have seen what happens to countries that deny this ability. In china millions died in one year and they just simply "forgot" to report it. Millions starving and they felt no body really needed to know about it. Should we allow this to happen inside our own country?
Wikileaks a former non profit organization made the following statement: "We believe that it is not only the people of one country that keep their government honest, but also the people of other countries who are watching that government. That is why the time has come for an anonymous global avenue for disseminating documents the public should see."
Martin Luther King once said "Cowardice asks the question, 'Is it safe?' Expediency asks the question, 'Is it politic?' Vanity asks the question, 'Is it popular?' But, conscience asks the question, 'Is it right?' And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular but one must take it because one's conscience tells one that it is right." Despite it being the opinion that this information should be removed from public eye making things confidential allows people to act in such a way that is inappropriate to their position. If you are a public figure it is not your right to act as you want on the job, while you are in that position you must bend to the will of the people. You represent us thus you have no will of your own as you are in that position of authority. It may not be pleasent it may not be colorful but you represent a mass of people that have been made ignorant because of a sick whim to skillfully use them.
Wikileaks had at one time had purchased several other domains and despite the choice of the domain being ripped from the web being reversed it has still yet to reappear on the web.
You may question yourself prove that someone has been affected... Journalists have been in danger for what they believe is true or should be known publicly before. This has been seen 08-12-07 when Abderrahim Ariri an editor of an Arabic newspaper was sentenced to a 6 month conviction for reporting about a leaked government security memo. They tried him for receiving documents obtained by criminal means. Another journalist,Mostapha Hurmatallah, received an 8 month sentence on the same charge. Both of these men were arrested in Casablanca 3 days after writing about the happenings. They were questioned by police about the Al-Qaeda's North African branch, after recieving information that was at the time confidential by the country's intelligence department (DGST). More then 20 secret service agents stormed the press removing equipment and several documents. After the case was made Both men were retained in prison.
We believe that a man that fights in battle with a gun and gets taken by the enemy is a hero based upon he was fighting for the people. However, what about the men and women who write about the truth and get the "iron hand" by the government. Is it to be another time where a "red curtain" is pulled and draped upon the public eyes?
Another thing that plagues the United States is our actions enforced on our troops. In iraq they are deprived of incinerators and instead use burn pits to dispose of toxic materials. This is an issue because many of these troops are suffering symptoms which include : chronic bronchitis, asthma, sleep apnea, chronic coughs and allergy-like symptoms. Many of these men have developed tumors where the suspected cause was these toxic materials.The governments response was simple “There is and will continue to be a need for burn pits during contingency operations,”. Our soldiers fight for us and we slowly kill them through these actions.
Australian Communications and Media Authority has made moves to fine websites that hyper link to Australian banned websites up to 11 thousand dollars a day. This came into action when an anti-abortion agency was hyper linked inside another website's forum. ACMA is out of their minds if they believe that everybody internationally should be subject to the whims of the Australian government. This plan was put into play to remove sites that are illegal however the implications of this state that sites that have a legal means of being on the web can and will be removed if they host questionable material that Australia believes is a danger to their interests. Currently anything that is hosted in Australia is subject to these whimsical ideals, despite the Australian government's casual additions to their "blacklist". What's more insane about this is that any site that adds a link to a site that added a link will be blacklisted thus the list just gets larger and larger and larger. I really must question if they are out of their mind. If the blacklist is confidential and you can't see what sites are blacklisted how do you protect your own website from getting blacklisted? a spoof i found online that refers to this which i found extremely amusing was The spoof ver funny
If a website is public domain for anyone outside of the country then it is subject to that country's laws as well as its own. Traditionally the Internet has been classified as something outside of territorial control however more recently several different individuals as well as countries have tried to override this. While i don't believe that other governments should be affected like this, site owners should not be sued by people in other countries simply because of that country's actions. What i'm referring to is ,Yu Ling, wife of Wang Xianoning, whom was imprisoned after criticizing the chinese government inside a group hosted by Yahoo, wants to gain monitary compensation for her husband's arrest. She feels that he felt that yahoo wouldn't release information on her husband's post. These groups are public domain to post and read, there are terms you must accept to join any one of these groups. If this man did not read these terms it's his own fault or didn't read between the line then that's a shame. However the terms are very accessable, and many people overlook or are too lazy to read them, but they exist on each group.
- Rory Williams
Visit my Myspace and say hello!!!
Australian Government was also exposed for unI found it interesting how the website wikileaks.org was ripped from the web after releasing several confidential government documents. Wikileaks was at one point in time developing an uncensored version of wikepdia. however after exposing gov. Palin's private email address. Not only was Gov Palin's email addressed exposed but they took control of the account and exposed a number of emails exchanged between Palin and Alaskan Lieutenant Governor Sean Parnell about his campaign for Congress.A draft letter to California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, mentioning nominations for the state court of appeals, many emails about the Alaska Department of Public Safety were seized. It's fairly interesting that implications have been made that these emails concerning DPS who's main job is to supervise the Alaska state troopers were relevant regarding Gov Palin's former brother-in-law and her push for removing him from the force. I am happy to see that he is still a part of the force, I would hate to see someone lose their job simply over bad blood between two families and one person's governmental influence. Inside her contact listing
Australian Government was also exposed for un-ethical behavior of their dental program *they denied such allegations* ...
Wiki leaks believed that if what the government did was transparent there would be less corruption as they would be subject to the public eye. They had supported the idea that a democracy should have an educated mass that had the ability to see everything they had an interest in. They had believed that because the mass population are uneducated in world and current local affairs it is why they are preyed upon as they are ignorant to what goes behind them.
I remember once stumbling on an ex CIA opperation called project butterfly exposing the CIA's attempt to recreate Nazi brain control done during WW1, recently i found that the article was removed and is no longer accessable. The question is should practices like this be exposed, when they most certainly do exist. Or should the public remain intoxicated on whatever fumes the government spits at them?
Wiki leaks believed that if what the government did was transparent there would be less corruption as they would be subject to the public eye. They had supported the idea that a democracy should have an educated mass that had the ability to see everything they had an interest in. They had believed that because the mass population are uneducated in world and current local affairs it is why they are preyed upon as they are ignorant to what goes behind them.
I remember once stumbling on an ex CIA operation called project butterfly exposing the CIA's attempt to recreate Nazi brain control done during WW1, recently i found that the article was removed and is no longer accessible. The question is should practices like this be exposed, when they most certainly do exist. Or should the public remain intoxicated on whatever fumes the government spits at them? This woman in question was perm scarred from the damage done to her mind. She will never be the same as she was before.
Before talking about this farther i want to share with you a few quotes.
“We were young, we were foolish, we were arrogant, but we were right.” -- Daniel Ellsberg (Pentagon Papers)
“Three things can not hide for long: the Moon, the Sun and the Truth” -- Siddhartha
It was once said by the United States Supreme Court that "only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government." This statement created by them is undeniably true. If the press is enforced to only report on what the government believes is acceptable then they are not reporting the whole truth, they are just reporting the bits and pieces of it that is ready to become public. We have seen what happens to countries that deny this ability. In china millions died in one year and they just simply "forgot" to report it. Millions starving and they felt no body really needed to know about it. Should we allow this to happen inside our own country?
Wikileaks a former non profit organization made the following statement: "We believe that it is not only the people of one country that keep their government honest, but also the people of other countries who are watching that government. That is why the time has come for an anonymous global avenue for disseminating documents the public should see."
Martin Luther King once said "Cowardice asks the question, 'Is it safe?' Expediency asks the question, 'Is it politic?' Vanity asks the question, 'Is it popular?' But, conscience asks the question, 'Is it right?' And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular but one must take it because one's conscience tells one that it is right." Despite it being the opinion that this information should be removed from public eye making things confidential allows people to act in such a way that is inappropriate to their position. If you are a public figure it is not your right to act as you want on the job, while you are in that position you must bend to the will of the people. You represent us thus you have no will of your own as you are in that position of authority. It may not be pleasent it may not be colorful but you represent a mass of people that have been made ignorant because of a sick whim to skillfully use them.
Wikileaks had at one time had purchased several other domains and despite the choice of the domain being ripped from the web being reversed it has still yet to reappear on the web.
You may question yourself prove that someone has been affected... Journalists have been in danger for what they believe is true or should be known publicly before. This has been seen 08-12-07 when Abderrahim Ariri an editor of an Arabic newspaper was sentenced to a 6 month conviction for reporting about a leaked government security memo. They tried him for receiving documents obtained by criminal means. Another journalist,Mostapha Hurmatallah, received an 8 month sentence on the same charge. Both of these men were arrested in Casablanca 3 days after writing about the happenings. They were questioned by police about the Al-Qaeda's North African branch, after recieving information that was at the time confidential by the country's intelligence department (DGST). More then 20 secret service agents stormed the press removing equipment and several documents. After the case was made Both men were retained in prison.
We believe that a man that fights in battle with a gun and gets taken by the enemy is a hero based upon he was fighting for the people. However, what about the men and women who write about the truth and get the "iron hand" by the government. Is it to be another time where a "red curtain" is pulled and draped upon the public eyes?
Another thing that plagues the United States is our actions enforced on our troops. In iraq they are deprived of incinerators and instead use burn pits to dispose of toxic materials. This is an issue because many of these troops are suffering symptoms which include : chronic bronchitis, asthma, sleep apnea, chronic coughs and allergy-like symptoms. Many of these men have developed tumors where the suspected cause was these toxic materials.The governments response was simple “There is and will continue to be a need for burn pits during contingency operations,”. Our soldiers fight for us and we slowly kill them through these actions.
Australian Communications and Media Authority has made moves to fine websites that hyper link to Australian banned websites up to 11 thousand dollars a day. This came into action when an anti-abortion agency was hyper linked inside another website's forum. ACMA is out of their minds if they believe that everybody internationally should be subject to the whims of the Australian government. This plan was put into play to remove sites that are illegal however the implications of this state that sites that have a legal means of being on the web can and will be removed if they host questionable material that Australia believes is a danger to their interests. Currently anything that is hosted in Australia is subject to these whimsical ideals, despite the Australian government's casual additions to their "blacklist". What's more insane about this is that any site that adds a link to a site that added a link will be blacklisted thus the list just gets larger and larger and larger. I really must question if they are out of their mind. If the blacklist is confidential and you can't see what sites are blacklisted how do you protect your own website from getting blacklisted? a spoof i found online that refers to this which i found extremely amusing was The spoof ver funny
If a website is public domain for anyone outside of the country then it is subject to that country's laws as well as its own. Traditionally the Internet has been classified as something outside of territorial control however more recently several different individuals as well as countries have tried to override this. While i don't believe that other governments should be affected like this, site owners should not be sued by people in other countries simply because of that country's actions. What i'm referring to is ,Yu Ling, wife of Wang Xianoning, whom was imprisoned after criticizing the chinese government inside a group hosted by Yahoo, wants to gain monitary compensation for her husband's arrest. She feels that he felt that yahoo wouldn't release information on her husband's post. These groups are public domain to post and read, there are terms you must accept to join any one of these groups. If this man did not read these terms it's his own fault or didn't read between the line then that's a shame. However the terms are very accessable, and many people overlook or are too lazy to read them, but they exist on each group.
- Rory Williams
Visit my Myspace and say hello!!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
