Elton John and " Klara and Edda belly dancing "

I was reading up on some old world news and noticed that  Sir Elton John has been caught with possession of child pornography. Apparently Elton acknowledged that he owned the artwork J "Klara and Edda Belly-Dancing" featuring to underage girls portrayed in a rather indecent manor.There are a few things that are a bit disturbing about this, that being that the artwork has been featured within new york, texas, and many places around the world. The question that comes to mind is where do you draw the line between graphic art and indecent pornographic material, especially when featuring underage girls. The second thing that is unsettling is the public questioning Elton John's integrity. What's odd about this is that Elton John isn't even sexually attracted towards women, so i don't see how this piece of artwork is even relevant as it doesn't display anything he is attracted towards. Now on the note of is it considered artwork, yes it is considered artwork no matter how graphic as artwork is defined by the creator, not the mass.